Saturday, April 27, 2019

Rajesh Khanna respect thread.

First of all Rajesh Khanna gained such super stardom that no other actor in our country has ever witnessed. This stardom lasted from 1969 till 1974.
To quote from the answer of Syed Ss
“Those days when rajesh khanna was giving huge and numerous hits consistently, almost all the theaters in all the cities/towns used to play only his films. This acted like the overdose for the movie goers, they started looking for someone other than the usual thing around them…..”
Like when you start to eat too many carrots then you would like to try other fruits/foods, they wanted to stop seeing Rajesh Khanna all the time.
So the first loss of Rajesh Khanna was his stardom.
But Rajesh still continued to have hits, he just was not on the top of his game anymore in terms of success rate.
Post 1974 Rajesh Khanna’s career:
If Red Rose, Amrit, Avataar displayed his acting skills then Maqsad (1984), Prem Kahani (1975), Chhailla Babu (1977) were box office hits continuing his stardom.
He was versatile too, as he couldn’t just do romance but also action like: Ittefaq (1969), Maha Chor (1976) etc.
For most of the 1980’s Rajesh was still the highest paid actor of India:
“was the highest paid Indian actor from 1970 to 1987

  1. Highest paid actor: Regional actor Chiranjeevi put both Rajesh and Amitabh behind in terms of that. But still Rajesh’s achievement is legendary, to be the highest paid for 18 years straight, when Chiranjeevi and amitabh were not highest paid for even half as many years as rajesh was the highest paid.
  2. 8 hits in one year (1985):
  3. 15 hits in fifteen months (1 year and three months: "This run is only bettered by a run by Rajesh Khanna which lasted 15 months from October 69 till February 71 which consisted of 9 consecutive major hits including six blockbuster/super hit films." https://www.boxofficeindia.com/report-details.php?articleid=108
  4. Stardom: During 1973 americans called Rajesh "the biggest star of the biggest film industry in the world" they claimed "every film he touches turns to gold". He had several hits after 1973 as well. He’s the only actor in the world to have 15 solo hits continously in three years without a single flop. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XvX6p2OoGP0
  5. Acting talent: He is a method actor, look at his character roles:
    1. Red Rose (1980)
    2. Ittefaq (1969)
    3. Avtaar (1983)
    4. Amrit (1986)
    5. Anand (1971)
    6. Namak Haraam (1973)
    7. Roti (1974)
    8. Do Raaste (1949)
    9. Daag: A Poem of Love (1973)
    10. Bewafai (1985)
    11. Rajput (1982)
Rajesh’s problem was that towards the end of the 1980’s he decided to stop trying and focusing on his cinematic career/work. In the 1990’s and 2000’s he was even more inactive.

Chiranjeevi respect thread.

  • Chiranjeevi
9 highest grossers of the year in Tollywood (the industry that created the bahubali 1 and 2 that you all overrate so much).
He was extremely versatile he could do comedy, action, romance and many genres. Akshay Kumar’s “Gabbar Is Back” is copied from Chiranjeevi’s “Tagore”.
He’s one of the few megastars and was bigger than amitabh.
Was also invited as “guest of honor” in the oscars.
Media rarely talks about Chiranjeevi concerning Tollywood and amitabh, they only speak about bahubali.

Wednesday, March 27, 2019

Debunking misconceptions about Ramayana.

1 - Hanumana could not be wounded
First wound:
"Then, your left cheekbone, zygomatic arch, is broken when you fell down on a highest mountaintop, from thereupon your name-phrase is indeed averred as Hanumaan... [4-66-24] "Then on observing that you are mutilated, highly infuriated is that scent-wafter Air-god and that tempestuous Air-god has not physically circulated throughout the triad of worlds... [4-66-25]
Second wound:
Indrajit the wielder of a great bow smacked the chest-region of Jambavan with an arrow and released ten arrows towards Hanuman, the swift monkey. Indrajit, that strong and highly courageous demons, pierced those jewels among the monkeys there with his arrows which resembled flames of fire and began to shout in triumph. Tormenting them with a multitude of arrows and frightening the monkeys, the mighty armed Indrajit heartily laughed and spoke (as follows).”
Third wound:
"Hanuma, thus struck with Ravana's palm, reeled repeatedly. Under the shock, Hanuma reeled once again. Seeing that mighty Hanuma exhausted, Ravana turned his chariot towards Nila."
Fourth wound:
"Hearing the words of Rama, Ravana of great strength, full of rage and recollecting his former hostility struck with flaming arrows resembling the tongues of the Fire of Dissolution, on Hanuman the son of Wind-God, who with extreme velocity, was bearing Rama in the battle-field. Thereupon, seeing Hanuman the Tiger among the monkeys getting wounded by Ravana, Rama was transported with anger."
Fifth wound:
"Thereupon, lifting up a sword, Trishira the foremost of demons them dug it into Hanuma's breast. Hurt by the thrust of the sword, the valiant Hanuma the son of wind-god, struck Trishira on his breast, with his palm."
Sixth wound:
"That Hanuma, struck in his broad chest by the spike in that great combat, was highly perturbed and while vomiting blood from his mouth, awfully roared like the sound of thunderous clouds at the time of dissolution of the world."
Seventh wound:
Indrajit the excellent demon struck all those foremost of monkeys, namely Hanuman, Sugreeva, Angada, Gandhamadana, Jambavan, Sushena, Vegadarshina, Mainda, Dvivida, Nila, Gavaksha, Gavaya, Kesari, Hariloma, Vidyuddamshtra, Suryanana, Jyothimukha, a monkey called Dadhimukha, Pavakaksha, Nala as also a monkey named Kumuda. Tearing asunder the principal monkey-warriors by maces and arrows, which were of golden colour, that Indrajit rained a multitude of showers of arrows equal to sun's rays on Rama and Lakshmana. "O Lakshmana! This Indrajit, by a great missile, is throwing down our army of monkeys and tormenting us incessantly with his sharp arrows." "Let this chief of demons, who is surpassing all, be covered with a multitude of showers of arrows. This entire army of Sugreeva, whose leading warriors have fallen, looks no more charming." Thus causing the army of monkeys along with Rama and Lakshmana to become despondent in battle, that Indrajit, getting eulogized by the demons, quickly reached the city of Lanka
Eighth wound:
"Oozing the blood from his wound caused by those arrows descended into his head (by Aksha), looking like the newly risen sun, his eyes bathed in blood rolling rapidly, Hanuma shone brightly like the sun surrounded by a circle of rays, having the arrows as its rays"
"Then, the mighty armed Hanuma, who knew how to act under particular circumstances, roaring when pierced in the breast with shafts by the high souled heroic, Aksha"
Tenth wound (the ropes caused a wound on hanutati beta of kutta vayu):
"Hanuma, liberated from the missile being dragged away by the demons and afflicted by the ties of ropes, could not realize that he was liberated from the missile."
Eleventh Wound:
"Though tortured by the demons that Hanuma, of terrific prowess,"
Hanuman was dumb enough to believe that Seetha died:
"That Seetha for whose sake we have fought so far, with a wish to do what is pleasing to Rama, making a special effort to win, risking our lives has been killed."
2 - Vibhishana, Kubera, Kumbhakarna were Ravana's only brothers
Debunk: In Yuddha Kanda several other brothers of Ravan are described.
Yuddhonmatta & Matta:
"seeing his paternal uncles as also Yuddhonmatta and Matta (Mahodara and Mahaparshva) his brothers and the foremost of demons having been fallen down, Atikaya of great splendour"
"Seeing Narantaka dying, Devantaka, Trishira and Mahodara the son of Pulastya the foremost of demons, wept."
"Seeing Mahodara his young paternal uncle killed. Trishira was enraged seized hold of his bow and struck Hanuma with sharp arrows."
Mattanika:
67. tasmin = (When) that Mahaparshva; ravaNasya bhaatari = the brother of Ravana;
Then, a strong monkey called Rishabha came jumping and stood in front of that Mattanika (Mahaparshva), the younger brother of Ravana.
http://www.valmikiramayan.net/utf8/yuddha/sarga70/yuddha_70_frame.htm
Khara/Dushana:
"two more bothers of mine are Khara and Duushana who are renowned for their bravery in war." [3-17-22b, 23]
http://www.valmikiramayan.net/utf8/aranya/sarga17/aranya_17_frame.htm
Rama says Trishira was a brother of Khara (ravan's other brother):
"Here is the region, (known as Panchavati, so called because it consists of five banyan trees) where Khara the demon was killed by me with straight-going arrows, as also his brothers, Dushana and the mighty Trishiras."
http://www.valmikiramayan.net/utf8/yuddha/sarga123/yuddha_123_frame.htm
So children of Vishrava:
  1. Kubera
  2. Ravana
  3. Trishira
  4. Khara
  5. Dushana
  6. Kumbhakarna
  7. Mahodara
  8. Mattanika
  9. Vibheesan
  10. Surpanakha (only daughter)
  11. Yuddhomata
  12. Matta
He had ten brothers.
3 - Ravana had a older sister named Kumbhinasi
Debunk: Kumbhinasa was not Ravan’s sister (Sanskrit only mentions her name not the word “sister” it differs from the English translation): http://www.valmikiramayan.net/utf8/yuddha/sarga7/yuddha_7_frame.htm English translation says sister, Sanskrit text says Kumbhinasa not sister. Sanskrit > English.
4 - Rama had only one wife
Debunk: He had many wives.
1st quote:
"Rama's wives will get delighted. Your daughters-in-law will be unhappy because of Bharata's waning position."
2nd quote:
"Having fulfilled your father's command as per the order of his words and observed your vow, you return from the forest fearlessly and having accomplished your purpose, I think you will enjoy carnally with large-eyed women."
3rd quote (Rama admitted that he found "wives" more than one wife):
"Wives may be obtained ever where. Relatives can be had every where. However, I do not find a brother, born of the same womb, at such a place whatesoever."
https://valmikiramayan.net/utf8/yuddha/sarga101/yuddha_101_frame.htm
4th quote (Surpanakha was a Rakshasi wife of Rama):
taam pramadaam adhikR^itya = that, lady, owing to; taabhyaam ubhaabhyaam = by them, the two; sambhuuya = together; aham = I am; a naathaa satii yathaa = without, protector/husband, [insecure] female, as with; tathaa = likewise; imaam avasthaam niitaa = this sort of, situation, led into.
http://www.valmikiramayan.net/utf8/aranya/sarga19/aranya_19_frame.htm She would've had her husband if it weren't for Seetha.
"Oh, goggle eyed one, befitting to your complexion that is unblemishedyou better become the wife of my brother Rama who is abounding in means, and on becoming the younger wife of that adorable one, you too will achieve your means and thus you will be happy. [3-18-10]
http://www.valmikiramayan.net/utf8/aranya/sarga18/aranya_18_frame.htm
Another source: https://www.quora.com/Did-Lord-rama-had-any-other-woman-in-his-life-besides-Sita/answer/Ravana-Rakshendra
5 - The chakra Ravana tanked was not Vishnu's but other Devas
Debunk: Hahahah, only footnotes say that. And foot notes are not a part of the epic.
Read both chapters:
His body bears hundreds of welts caused when assaulted with Vishnu-disc for hundreds of times in wars with gods, and when assaulted for hundreds of times with the other assaults-missiles in other gruesome wars as well, and Shuurpanakha saw at such a Ravana. [3-32-10]
Those arms had wounds made by stabbing from the pointed edges of tusks of Iraavata and fleshy shoulders smeared with diamond and hit by Vishnu chakra.”
6 - Ravana had only three wives
Debunk: Stop using wikipedia & fake sources.
Here is the evidence that Ravana had over a thousand wives:
"Here, surrounded by more than a thousand fellow-wives, Ravana's wife named Mandodari lamented for Ravana."
7 - Tara was (Vali's wife) was Sugreeva's wife (sanskrit says she was his cheif aka "pramukh" wife):
"O king! I wish to reach the capital City of Ayodhya along with you, accompanied by the wives of other monkey-chiefs with Tara and other beloved wives of Sugreeva."
http://www.valmikiramayan.net/utf8/yuddha/sarga123/yuddha_123_frame.htm
Mahabharata claims Vali & Sugriva were both attracted to the same woman so they fought eachother for her:
"And that fight, so destructive of the trees, looked like the encounter in days of yore between the brothers Vali and Sugriva for the possession of the same woman."
http://www.sacred-texts.com/hin/m03/m03011.htm
8 - Angada was superior to Meghanada (lol)
Debunk: When Angad had crores of Vanaras to support him he was defeated by Meghnad.
1st defeat:
"Indrajit the excellent demon struck all those foremost of monkeys, namely Hanuman, Sugreeva, Angada, Gandhamadana, Jambavan, Sushena, Vegadarshina, Mainda, Dvivida, Nila, Gavaksha, Gavaya, Kesari, Hariloma, Vidyuddamshtra, Suryanana, Jyothimukha, a monkey called Dadhimukha, Pavakaksha, Nala as also a monkey named Kumuda. Tearing asunder the principal monkey-warriors by maces and arrows, which were of golden colour, that Indrajit rained a multitude of showers of arrows"
"Vibhishana and Hanuma saw Sugreeva, Angada, Nila, Sharabha, Gandhamadana, Gavaksha, Sushena, Vegadarshi, Mainda, Nala, Jyotimukha and a monkey called Dvivida, who were struck down on the battle-field."
9 - Rudra & Shiva are the same (lol)
Debunk: Yet they are mentioned seperately here.
"He saw the abode of Brahma the lord of creation, Kailasa the abode of Shiva the lord of dissolution, the abode of Indra the lord of celestials, the arrow-discharging place of Rudra, the worshipping place of Hayagriva, the horse-faced form of Vishnu, the shining place at which Brahma's head fell down, the sun-god and Kimkaras."
http://www.valmikiramayan.net/utf8/yuddha/sarga74/yuddha_74_frame.htm
10 - Ravan didn't touch Seetha.
Debunk:
On saying that sentence to Maithili, who by herself is a nice talker and who is a proper one for addressing with nice words, that verily evil-minded demon Ravana maddened by lust drew nigh of Seetha and grabbed her, as Budha, the Jupiter grabs the Star Rohini in firmament. [3-49-15b, 16] He that Ravana grabbed the lotus-eyed Seetha on lifting her up with his left hand at her plait of hair at nape, and with his right hand at her thighs. [3-49-17]
http://www.valmikiramayan.net/utf8/aranya/sarga49/aranya_49_frame.htm
"My heart, which was subservient to me, was abiding in you. What could I do, helpless as I was, with regard to my limbs which had fallen under the sway of another?" [Seetha to Rama]
http://www.valmikiramayan.net/utf8/yuddha/sarga116/yuddha_116_frame.htm
Sugreeva exposed the incident:
"by inference I know her... undoubtedly I have seen Maithilee while that demon with cruel deeds was abducting her... then she was crying piteously calling "Rama, Rama..." and also calling "Lakshmana" and she was writhing in the flanks of Ravana like the wife of serpent's lord..."[4-6-8b, 9, 10]
https://valmikiramayan.net/utf8/kish/sarga6/kishkindha_6_frame.htm
11 - Surpanakha was ugly.
Debunk:
"I too wish to know about you. Whose wife are you? What is your name? Or, whose daughter are you? By the way, you are with most enthralling limbs, and then you must be a rakshasii." [3-17-18]
http://www.valmikiramayan.net/utf8/aranya/sarga17/aranya_17_frame.htm
"You woo him, oh, board-eyed [bulged-eyed] one, this brother of mine as your husband like sunshine seeking the Mt. Meru, then oh, great-waisted [pot-bellied] one, you will be without a co-wife " So said Rama to that demoness. [3-18-5]
"Oh, goggle eyed one, befitting to your complexion that is unblemished, you better become the wife of my brother Rama who is abounding in means, and on becoming the younger wife of that adorable one, you too will achieve your means and thus you will be happy. [3-18-10]
"Oh, best complexioned one with best waist, is there any wiseacre to simply discard your kind of best personality, indeed, in preference to human females?" Lakshmana said so to Shuurpanakha. [3-18-12]
http://www.valmikiramayan.net/utf8/aranya/sarga18/aranya_18_frame.htm
[Clearly Rama was attracted to her].
12 - Seetha fasted during her stay at Lanka.
Debunk: The description of her body prior to her meeting with Hanumana:
"The beautifully haired Seetha's left eye, which was auspicious, whose surrounding row of eye-lashes were curved, which was black, wide and bright-looking; was predominantly quivering, like a red lotus quivered by the blow of a fish. Her left shoulder, which was pretty, distinguished beefy and round, which deserved to be applied with excellent black aloe and sandalwood paste, which had been used for long as a pillow by her most excellent beloved Rama, quickly quivered. Of her two thighs kept together, the left tigh which was beefy and well born, which resembled the trunk of a princely elephant was predominantly quivering, spoke indistinctly of existence of Rama in front. Again, the clothing of Seetha standing there, of spotless eyes and charming limbs, having teeth resembling the buds of jasmine, which was of golden shade and was slightly soiled as it were with dust, glited down, which appeared auspicious (for her). Bolstered by these and some other omens which straight explained that they were fruitful on the earlier occasion also, Seetha of beautiful eyebrows disclosed a great joy, even as a seed vanished and withered by the wind and the sun, got sprouted by rain. Moreover, having the lips resembling Bimba fruit, having beautiful eyes and eyebrows, whose eye lids are curved, having charming white teeth, her face shone like the moon liberated from the mouth of the demon Rahu. Free from sorrow, her weariness removed, her mental affliction alleviated and her consciousness awakened with exaltation, that esteemed lady (Seetha) looked handsome with her countenance, as a night with the moon appears during the bright fortnight."
http://www.valmikiramayan.net/utf8/sundara/sarga29/sundara_29_frame.htm
She was clearly well fed and healthy, not weary at all. Notice that her clothes were of golden shade (ravan or someonelse had to have given her that cloth). She was wearing clothes of royalty. Dust is obviously going to accumulate on the clothes, as she was moving around, and there would be dust in the air of lanka during wartimes.
13 - Ravan had ten heads.
Debunk: Logically he only had one head:
"By whom and by which purpose of his you are made to blunder upon this awry path, oh, king, it is as good as his hitting hard on your head while you are fast asleep. [3-31-45]
http://www.valmikiramayan.net/utf8/aranya/sarga31/aranya_31_frame.htm
If he had twenty arms then he would use ten bows but in wars he is described with one bow.
14 - Hanuman was immortal. (xD)
Debunk: Indra gave lord hanutati a boon to make sure hanuman dies not that he's immortal, it's clearly stated that his death will occur.
"Oh, ablest Hanuma, the Thousand-eyed Indra kind-heartedly gave you a choicest boon saying that your death occurs only by your own volition." [4-66-28, 29a]
http://www.valmikiramayan.net/kishkindha/sarga66/kishkindha_66_frame.htm
15 - Ravan was killed fairly.
Debunk:
With acts and means and applying thy power of illusion to these waters, slay, O chief of the Bharatas, this Suyodhana, who is the very soul of illusion! With acts and means Indra himself slew the Daityas and the Danavas! Vali himself was bound by that high-souled one (Upendra), with the aid of many acts and means! The great Asura Hiranyaksha, as also that other one, Hiranyakasipu, was slain by the aid of many acts and means. Without doubt, O king, Vritra also was slain by the aid of acts! Similarly was the Rakshasa Ravana of Pulastya's race, with his relatives and followers, slain by Rama!
https://www.sacred-texts.com/hin/m09/m09031.htm Krishna claimed Rama used illusion to kill Ravana.
Arrow used to kill ravan was made of maya/illusion:
aakaasha mayam = was made of ether.
http://www.valmikiramayan.net/utf8/yuddha/sarga108/yuddha_108_frame.htm
Ram didn't know how to kill Ravan:
"Why are you still carrying out the battle with Ravana as though you are unaware (of how to dispose of him)?"
http://www.valmikiramayan.net/utf8/yuddha/sarga108/yuddha_108_frame.htm
16 - Lakshman killed a real man like Indrajeet fairly (lol).
Debunk: Namard lakshman wasn't a real man.
Badhwa Lakshman was protected by a celestial armor -
"Understanding Lakshmana to have been protected by an impenetrable armour and showing his swiftness in discharging missiles, Indrajit the son of Ravana, who felt very much angered, pierced Lakshmana in the forehead with three arrows provided with good plumes."
Even indra saved lakshman -
"Placing Indra the lord of celestials as their head, the sages, manes, gods, Gandharvas the celestial musicians, eagles and serpents protected Lakshmana in the battle-field."
http://www.valmikiramayan.net/utf8/yuddha/sarga90/yuddha_90_frame.htm
Meghanad destroyed celestial armor -
"Thereafter, the valiant Indrajit of terrific prowess was enraged and wounded Lakshmana with a thousand arrows in battle.The large celestial armour of Lakshmana broke into pieces. The two warriors vied with each other in offence and retaliation in their attack."
http://www.valmikiramayan.net/utf8/yuddha/sarga88/yuddha_88_frame.htm
17 - Ram was avatar of Vishnu lol.
Debunk: Rama considered himself a human not god.
"I think of myself to be a human being, by name Rama, the son of Dasaratha.."
https://www.valmikiramayan.net/utf8/yuddha/sarga117/yuddha_117_frame.htm
18 - a namard aryan king like Dasarath defeated a real man like Ravan (lol)
Debunk:
Thus when he is said so by that sage Vishvamitra, then the king Dasharatha spoke to the sage, "I myself am not capable of standing against that evil minded Ravana, in truth, where is the question of deputing my young Rama to confront him? [1-20-20]
http://www.valmikiramayan.net/utf8/baala/sarga20/bala_20_frame.htm
19 - Dasharatha had 3 wives lol.
Debunk: Two quotes of Ramayan would like a word with you.
"Oh, Sumantra! being all my wives, who are here. Surrounded by all of them, I want to see the virtuous Rama. Encircling Kausalya, three hundred fifty women, steadfast in their vow(of devotion to their husband), with their eyes reddened, went there slowly. After arrival of his wives, king Dasaratha spoke to that charioteer as follows, "Oh, Sumantra! Bring my son here."
http://www.valmikiramayan.net/utf8/ayodhya/sarga34/ayodhya_34_frame.htm
"Uttering the aforesaid words of such quality and appropriate meaning to his mother, Rama thought once again and gazed at his three hundred and fifty step-mothers."
http://www.valmikiramayan.net/utf8/ayodhya/sarga39/ayodhya_39_frame.htm
He had 350 women as wives.
20 - Ravan abducted Seetha because he wanted to avenge how Surpanakha was insulted or because he was in love with Seetha.
Debunk:
The real reason is due to the advice of Akampan (one of Ravan's warriors) he tells him to avoid a direct confrontation/war and just kidnap Ram's wife so that Ram himself will die in the sadness of losing his own wife.
Akampana's words: "You forcefully abduct his wife when she is in solitude, and indeed Rama will not exist reft of Seetha." Akampana advised Ravana in this way. [3-31-31]
Ravan's response: "Agreed! I wish to go alone early in the morning with a charioteer and I delightfully wish to lead Vaidehi into the elegant city Lanka." Ravana declared that way. [3-31-33]
Source: http://www.valmikiramayan.net/utf8/aranya/sarga31/aranya_31_frame.htm
21 - Shree Hanutati was among the eleven rudra's.
Debunk: The truth is that none of the Rudra's were hanuman. Hanuman was merely the son of Vayu who was a servant of Indra.
Their names "Aja. Ekapada, Ahivradhna, the unvanquished Pinakin, Rita, Pitrirupa, the three-eyed Maheswara, Vrishakapi, Sambhu, Havana, and Iswara--these are the celebrated Rudras, eleven in number, who are the lords of all the worlds. Even these eleven high-souled ones have been mentioned as a hundred in the Satarudra (of the Vedas)."
http://www.sacred-texts.com/hin/m13/m13b115.htm Hanuman is not among them.
22 - Lakshman had a wife name Urmila.
Debunk: Lakshman was actually unmarried.
Rama's voice - "He is without a wife and in need of a wife he is youthful, good-looking and he can become a fitly husband of yours, fit enough to your kind of features. [3-18-4]
http://www.valmikiramayan.net/utf8/aranya/sarga18/aranya_18_frame.htm Clearly Rama knows more about his brother than any of us do.
23 - Ravan was only a bhakt of Shiva not anyone else.
Debunk: False, this is not true. Ravan was also a devotee of Lakshmi not just Shiva.
"Images of elephants in a lotus-pool with filaments of lotus on body, with lotus petals held in their trunks, were devoted to the worship of an image of Goddess Lakshmi. And also an image of Goddess Lakshmi with four graceful hands and holding lotus in Her hand was made to exist in Pushpaka."
https://valmikiramayan.net/utf8/sundara/sarga7/sundara_7_frame.htm
His chariot had a idol of Lakshmi to worship her.
24 - Shiva's portion was Hanuman
Debunk: Hahahah! Hanutati bhakts continue to amuse me with their namardangi and bhadwagiri lies!
Here is the source: https://www.sacred-texts.com/hin/m13/m13a017.htm It says Shiva was everything and everyone in Ramayana and Mahabharata, that would mean even Ravan is an avatar of Shiva it is a exaggeration nothing more. Exaggerated statements have no meaning in a debate.
Over here even Agni is called a avatar of Shiva: https://www.sacred-texts.com/hin/m13/m13b126.htm
25 - Rama cared about saving Seetha.
Debunk: Wrong he only cared about her passing age how she was growing older.
"There is no anguish for me that my beloved is at a distance, nor that she was taken away. Her age is indeed passing away. Only about this, I am repenting."
Source - http://www.valmikiramayan.net/utf8/yuddha/sarga5/yuddha_5_frame.htm
He cared more about the death of Jatayu:
"To me, oh, enemy-inflamer, oh, gentle Lakshmana, anguish caused by Seetha's abduction is not that much, when compared with the anguish caused by the perish of this eagle, that too, because of me"
http://www.valmikiramayan.net/utf8/aranya/sarga68/aranya_68_frame.htm
26 - Lakshman never looked at any place of Seetha's body besides her feet.
Debunk:
Rama tells Lakshman to look at Seetha (Vaidehi):
"Punning in any way with the base and brutish is inapposite, oh, gentle Saumitri, mark note of Vaidehi, somehow surviving." [3-18-19]
http://www.valmikiramayan.net/utf8/aranya/sarga18/aranya_18_frame.htm
Both Seetha & Lakshman are within the range of Rama’s eyesight next to him:
They have seen the great-mighty Rama seated in the thatched cottage along with Seetha and Lakshmana attending to him.” [3-20-2]
http://www.valmikiramayan.net/utf8/aranya/sarga20/aranya_20_frame.htm
Ram tells Lakshman to take Seetha with him to a safe location:
“Oh, Soumitri, briefly tarry at the close of Seetha as I wish to eliminate these demons who have trailed the path of that demoness to here.”
http://www.valmikiramayan.net/utf8/aranya/sarga20/aranya_20_frame.htm
Lakshman cheered Seetha up:
"Observing the agonised aspect of Seetha that cheerless Saumitri started to cheer her up by repeatedly informing that her husband Rama will come soon. Even then Seetha has not spoken in the least to the brother of her husband, and maintained a silence of antipathy." [3-45-39]
http://www.valmikiramayan.net/utf8/aranya/sarga45/aranya_45_frame.htm
He held her in his arms:
"But then, holding Seetha in usual reverence that self-respectful Lakshmana briefly came to her fore making a reverential palm-fold that briefly, and then he proceeded to the proximity of Rama, while repeatedly looking back at that lonely lady in the thick of forest." [3-45-40]
http://www.valmikiramayan.net/utf8/aranya/sarga45/aranya_45_frame.htm
Clearly Lakshman looked at Seetha when he was holding her and trying to cheer her and took her to another place.
27 - "Vishwamitra was a ultimate warrior"
Debunk:
He was scared of Tataka and never confronted her or Maricha/Subahu.
http://www.valmikiramayan.net/utf8/baala/sarga19/bala_19_frame.htm
Raghava, that malevolent Tataka is always destroying the inhabitations at Malada and Karusha
http://www.valmikiramayan.net/utf8/baala/sarga24/bala_24_frame.htm
Their is a reference in Bala Kanda where Vishwamitra claims that it doesn’t suit him to behave angrily during rituals but that’s an excuse he could easily confront these demons when their are no rituals and when Rama talks about Tataka being a woman then Vishwamitra replies that protectors have to kill women when they violate their codes and harass people, so Vishwamitra could have followed the same policy of not caring about rituals.
28 - "hanuman was stronger than sugreeva, angad and all vanars"
Debunk: Lmaoooo hahahahah! Hanuman was just a joker & a comedian who had no contribution to Ramayan.
His own words prove his prowess was a joke:
"In them, some of the monkeys are superior to me and some are even equal to me. No one in the vicinity of Sugreeva is inferior to me."
http://www.valmikiramayan.net/utf8/sundara/sarga39/sundara_39_frame.htm
He was the most inferior vanar no one was weaker than hanuman everyone was stronger than him (hanuman).
And if any hanuman fan desires to use quotes where hanuman praised himself then it just shows that hanuman is a liar and his word meant nothing, hes not to be trusted. So this bhuzdil is nothing infront of Sugreev or Angad whether you compare them on accolades or feats Sugreev is superior in every way.
29 - "Hanuman lifted a whole mountain"
Debunk - This is completly false! Hanuman only lifted a peak not a whole mountain:
"Taking that mountain-peak, which looked like a dark rainy cloud, that Hanuman jumped up into the sky. Arriving with a great speed, Hanuma putting down the mountain-peak and resting for a while, spoke the following words to Sushena O the excellent of monkeys! I have brought the entire mountain-peak, as I could not identify those herbs."
http://www.valmikiramayan.net/utf8/yuddha/sarga101/yuddha_101_frame.htm
Conclusion: Always peak is mentioned nothing else not the whole mountain so stop overrating hanuman he was a scrub at warfare.
30 - "rama did not kill sambuk it is a incident from interpolated uttar kand"
Debunk - Hahahah lolol this is mentioned in Mahabharat too, so i advise you to stop lying to defend the izzat of a aadmi from a comic book like Ramayan.
Quote:
"It is heard that a Sudra named Samvuka having been slain and righteousness having been upheld by Rama of true prowess, a (dead) Brahmana child was restored to life."
31 - "valmiki never killed brahmins, he wasn't a theif either"
Debunk - Mahabharat declares these claims as false. And Mahabharat characters know more and better than any scholar, translater/translator or bhakt.
Quote for him being a thief:
"Some amongst them are even thieves (like Valmiki in his early years and Viswamitra during a famine)."
Valmiki accepts that he was accused of killing brahmins:
"Once upon a time, in course of a dialectical disputation, certain ascetics that were possessors of the homa fire denounced me as one guilty of Brahmanicide. As soon as they had denounced me as such, the sin of Brahmanicide, O Bharata, possessed me."
32 - "Meghanad was considered a sinner and adharmi by Valmiki"
Debunk - Actually heres a quote from the sanskrit text that has valmiki addressing meghanada as "Mahatma"
    mahaatmaa = the high spirited; Indrajit = Indrajit; nairR^itayuutha mukhyaH = the chief of army of demons; babhaashha = spoke
he was a better man than gandhi
33 - "Meghanad had help from Ravan and Kumbhkarn when he defeated Indra"
Debunk - Lol.... I highly doubt if you read Ramayan.
"At one time, the competent Devendra, the lord of three worlds, was indeed tossed down on the floor by me. All the flocks of celestials were cast into fear and all of them fled to different quarters." "Airavata (Indra`s elephant), which was making noise discordantly, was hurled down by me on the floor. I forcibly extracted its teeth and frightened the entire flock of celestials."
34 - "vibeeshan was a good uncle"
Debunk - This is false, because Vibeeshan for his entire life only undermined the confidence of his nephews and discouraged them, when his nephew would defend his reputation then Vibeeshan would send death threats to him:
"You surely are fit to be killed. Nay, he too is fit to be killed, who brought you, a reckless boy here today and ushered you foolishly in the proximity of counselors" [vibeeshan to meghanada]
35 - "Vibeeshan loved his wife and offspring"
Debunk: No he didn't, if he did then he would never leave them in lanka at the mercy of Ravan, he literally asked ravan to harm them "I, leaving my sons and my wife, have come to take refuge with Rama."
36 - "no skin color discrimination existed in Ramayan times"
Debunk: if so then why did minister Hanuman support people whose face was bright and not those that are dark? "His face is also bright. Hence, I do not doubt him." {quote from link below}if the face of vibeeshan was not bright then hanuman would have doubted him.
37 - "only rakshasas lived in lanka"
Debunk this is also a false claim, because sundara kanda clearly mentions that devtas were a part of the lankan population "Hanuma saw houses glittered by various riches, well worshipped by Devas and Asuras, devoid of all flaws and obtained by the self-might of rakshasas."
38 - "the wealthiest person was Kuber"
Debunk - actually ravan was the wealthyest:
"Whatever was the fortune of Kubera the King of Yakshas, of Yama and of Varuna, the same fortune or even greater treasure was at this house of Ravana.http://www.valmikiramayan.net/utf8/sundara/sarga9/sundara_9_frame.htm
39 - "most of the women ravan abducted were kept in lanka without their will"
Debunk - another false theory created to undermine a king that opposed aryans. The truth is most of these women fell in love with Ravan no matter how he treated them: "Women of royal sages, brahmanas and demons and of Gandharvas, of Rakshasas - all those unmarried girls surrendered from lust to Ravana."

Im tired of Ramayan tards and hanutards arguing, crying and barking.

Monday, October 29, 2018

Hanumana was a weak warrior.


  • EXPOSING HANUMAN
    • Bullshit excuses
      • Jambavant reminding Hanuman of his prowess does not mean much, it's just praise, everyone was compared to Ravan, Rama, Hanuman etc in Mahabharata, just like everyone is compared to Indra & the Vajra in Ramayan. And why does Jambavant's opinion matter? He has no feats, he's that guy that just stands their and watches as everyone else fights except for him. He is a LALLU if anything, because he only sang his own praises and praised others but never proved his own skill/strength.
      • Hanuman travelled 100 Yojanas to cross lanka not 100,000, if anything alot of others also did it, not just him. Travelling does not mean much in fighting. Goku from DBZ took 48 hours to cross 1 million miles, but still moved slowly in his fight against Vegeta.
      • Ravana's opinion is useless as Hanuman was still harmed by Indrajita's arrows.
Quote:
Indrajit, who knows the true nature of missiles, feeling certain that he was incapable of being killed, bound that Hanuma, the son of wind-god, by that presided over by Brahma the creator. Fastened with the weapon discharged by the demon, Hanuma became motionless and fell down on the ground. Realizing that he had been bound by a missile presided over by Brahma the Lord of creation that Hanuma failing to keep his swiftness, considered it to be a favour of Brahma the creator done to him.
Analysis: If you read the text further in the same sarga then you can see that Hanuman was freed from this bondage of Indrajit because another bondage was put on him. Hanuman did not have any capability to get rid of this bondage himself. And it is said Hanumana failed.
Source: http://www.valmikiramayan.net/utf8/sundara/sarga48/sundara_48_frame.htm

    • Then there's this pathetic statement ("hanuman killed Nikumbha who was equal to Ravan in prowess") Nikumbha has no feats or achievements to even be labeled a fraction of Ravan's strength. Hanuman killing 80 thousand kinkaras is meaningless because Angada killed 72 CRORE Rakshasas in Yuddha Kanda.
    • Hanuman could not have killed Ravan, notice the differences in their conditions ravan was not unconscious for the same amount of TIME as Hanuman was
Quote:
Under the shock, Hanuma reeled once again. Seeing that mighty Hanuma exhausted, Ravana turned his chariot towards Nila.
http://www.valmikiramayan.net/utf8/yuddha/sarga59/yuddha_59_frame.htm
Again:
Hanuma, thus struck with Ravana's palm, reeled repeatedly.
http://www.valmikiramayan.net/utf8/yuddha/sarga59/yuddha_59_frame.htm
These are both from the same sarga, the first quote is the second time hanuman reeled when he could not get up as quickly as he did in the second quote (the first time). When Ravan was struck by Hanuman, the first time he just regained his breath, he was not wounded at all. The second time Ravan was not prepared as it was a surprise attack while Ravan was trying to lift Lakshman's body.

  • What does Hanuman have against Vali who defeated Mayavi, Sugriv etc? Who helped the devas during the curning of the sea? Who juggled mountains around? Hanuman is no match for Angad who defeated Indrajit, who killed Narantaka & 72 crore Rakshasas.
  • And we all know that Indrajita defeated Hanuman with ease and no difficulties. So Angada would school Hanumana in a fight.
  • Sugriva can defeat Hanuman. Sugriv killed Kumbha (the character that defeated Angad), and threw hundreds of punches with Ravan. Whereareas Hanuman cannot even tolerate ONE PUNCH of Ravan. His capability is a hundred times more than Hanuman's.
  • Then their are other warriors in Ramayan who can defeat Hanuman like Rama, Lakshmana etc. Hanuman was not among the best ten warriors of Ramayan
    • Here are some warriors that are way better than hanuman
      • Rama - he defeated Ravan, Vali, Khara, Doosan, Kumbhakarna etc. Since Rama dominated Kumbhakarna, he is clearly superior to Hanuman. Kumbhakarna trashed Hanuman in a fight and made him vomit blood.
      • Ravan - he already defeated sugriva twice, who we know defeated kumbha, who defeated angad, who defeated indrajit, who defeated hanuman. And ravan knocked out hanuman twice.
When hanuman knocked ravan at that time ravan was still conscious he was not senseless, he was spending all his energy and time was dedicated to taking away Lakshman sso he was caught off guard and was not prepared just like goku from DBZ was not prepared when sorbet hit him with the laser, so Hanuman did that to a man that was distracted, not a relevant feat. Also Ravan did defeat Vishnu.
      • Sugriva - he exhausted Ravan, but was never exhausted by Ravan.
29. atha = then; harivaranaathaH = the Lord of the monkeys; praapta samgraama kiirtiH = acquiring fame as a warrior; yojayitvaa = reducing; nishicharapatim = Ravana; shrameNa = to exhaustion; laNghayitvaa = ascended; ativishaalam = into the infinite; gaganam = sky; arkasuunuH = and that offspring of the Sun; Sugreeva; jagaama = went; raamapaarshvam = to the side of Rama; harigaNabalamadhye = in the middle of the monkey-troops. Thus, the Lord of the monkeys, acquiring fame as a warrior, reducing Ravana to exhaustion, ascended into the infinite sky and the offspring of the Sun then went to the side of Rama, who as in the middle of the mokye-troops.

Same Ravan exhausted Hanuman. Sugriva also defeated Kumbha (the son of kumbhakarna) the same man that defeated angad, who defeated indrajita, who defeated hanuman.
        • SUGRIV DEFEATED RAVAN AGAIN (when ravan was using all his strategies & arts):
While sweat and blood their limbs bedewed They met, retreated, and pursued: Each stratagem and art they tried, Stood front to front and swerved aside. His hand a while the giant stayed And called his magic to his aid. But brave Sugríva, swift to know The guileful purpose of the foe, Gained with light leap the upper air. And breath and strength and spirit then; Then, joyous as for victory won, Returned to Raghu's royal son.

http://www.sacred-texts.com/hin/rama/ry439.htm YE TO RAMAYAN KIY WOH HISTORY HAI JOH BHOT KAM LOK JANTEY HAI 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
        • He even paralyzed Ravan & made him bleed to death:
Ravana and Sugreeva of great strength carried on a duel which was unbearable, with perspiration broke out on their limbs, with their bodies red with blood, each clung to other other paralyzing his opponent's movements resembling silk-cotton and Kimshuka trees, followed by blows of fists, slaps of hands blows of elbows and blows of fingers on each other.

Analysis: Sugriv could have easily finished the whole Ramayana war their if he wanted to, but no he did not. Just like Sunny Deol spared the life of amrish puri’s character in Damini (1993).
        • Sugriv killed all of vali’s generals
Quote:
34. Raghava; saH duSTa atmaa = he that, evil, minded one; mat vinaashaaya = for my, annihilation; yatnavaan ca = he tried, also; bahushaH = many times; tat= by him; prayuktaaH ca = deployed, also; vaanaraaH = monkeys [combatants]; nihataa mayaa = are killed, by me. "He that very evil minded one tried many times to annihilate me, and Raghava, I killed those combatants monkeys that are deployed by Vali to kill me. [4-8-34]
      • Angad - the grandson of indra, and the son of Vali, he defeated Indrajita Meghnad in one punch, while the same meghnad captured Hanuman and made him a prisoner who suffers whiplashes. Angad even killed 72 crore Rakshasas, has your hanuman ever killed even 1 crore? No, because he is not even 1/72nd of Angad’s prowess, Angad would eat Hanuman for breakfast.
Quote:
The enraged Indrajit struck the valiant Angada (who can tear asunder the enemy forces) with a mace, like Indra the Lord of celestials with his thunder-bolt. The swift monkey, Angada struck his chariot, having a variegated body of gold, along with horses and the charioteer in the battle.
      • Kumbha - the son of Kumbhakarna, and nephew of Ravan, he defeated Angada & Nila, and as we all know the same angada defeated meghnad and the same meghnad defeated your hanumanji.
He punk’d dwividha.
41. tena = by that; patriNaa = arrow; haaTakapuNkhena = with a golden shaft; patra raasasaa = fastened with feathers; aakarNakR^iShTamuktena = drawn upto the ear and discharged; (he); tadaa = then; jaghaana = struck; dvividam = Dvivida. By that arrow with a golden shaft and fastened with feathers, drawn upto his ear and discharged, he then struck Dvivida. 42. abhihataH = struck; sahasaa = suddenly; tena = by that arrow; plavagamottamaH = that foremost of monkeys; trikuuTaabhaH = having a splendour of Mount Trikuta; vipramuktapadaH = with his feet swaying to and fro; vihvalan = and perturbed; nipapaata = fell down; sphuran = throbbing. Suddenly struck by that arrow, that excellent monkey possessing a splendour of Mount Trikuta, was perturbed, with his feet swaying to and fro and fell down throbbing.
        • Kumbha DESTROYED ANGAD
Since Angada's blood was oozing out, his eyes were covered with blood; Covering his eyes, dampened with blood, with one hand, he caught hold of a Sala tree nearby with another hand. That Kumbha chopped off that tree with seven sharp arrows which were capable of splitting asunder the body. That Angada was very much perturbed and fell down, swooning. Seeing the unconquerable Angada fallen down and sinking into depression as though in an ocean, the monkey-chiefs informed the matter to Rama.
        • He then kidnapped Angada
58. tataH = then; shrutvaa = hearing; vaaliputram = about Angada; vyathitam = being seized with anguish; mahaavahe = in that great battle; raamaH = Rama; tataH = thereafter; vyaadidesha = sent out; harishreShThaan = for help the leaders of monkeys; jaambavaatpramukhaan = headed by Jambavan. Hearing of Angada being seized with anguish in that great combat, Rama sent out for help, leaders of monkeys, headed by Jambavan.
http://www.valmikiramayan.net/utf8/yuddha/sarga76/yuddha_76_frame.htm
      • Indrajita - he defeated Hanuman in a fair fight, no matter what anyone says he also proved his skills by using ordinary arrows to defeat Rama & Lakshmana (who even pretended to be dead just to make sure Indrajita Meghnad stops shooting).
19. maheSvaasaH = Indrajit the wielder of a great bow; viddhvaa = smacked; vakSasi = in the chest; jaambavantam = of Jambavan; baaNena = with an arrow; visasarja = (and) released; dasha = ten; sharaan = arrows; hanuumataH = (in the chest region of) Hanuman; vegavataH = the swift monkey. Indrajit the wielder of a great bow smacked the chest-region of Jambavan with an arrow and released ten arrows towards Hanuman, the swift monkey. 22. saH raavaNiH = that Indrajit; balavaan = the strong; mahaa sattvaH = and highly courageous demon; bhittvaa = pierced; taan = those; vaanara varaan = jewels among the mokeys; tatra = there; sharaiH = with his arrows; agni shikhopamaiH = resembling flames of fire; nanaada = and began to shout (in triumph). Indrajit, that strong and highly courageous demons, pierced those jewels among the monkeys there with his arrows which resembled flames of fire and began to shout in triumph. 23. ardayitvaa = tormenting; taan = them; baaNaughaiH = with a multitude of arrows; traasayitvaa cha = and frightening; vaanaraan = the monkeys; mahaabaahuH = the mighty armed Indrajit; prajahaasa = heartily laughed; abraviit = and spoke; idam = these; vachamcha = words. Tormenting them with a multitude of arrows and frightening the monkeys, the mighty armed Indrajit heartily laughed and spoke (as follows).
He defeated Angad and Hanuman.
      • Lakshmana - he defeated warriors like Indrajita Meghnad, Atikaya & don’t forget that all the vanaras were scared of him when he entered kishkinda, he could have caused the genocide of the entire vanara race.
      • Wiradha - He defeated Rama & Lakshmana in the woods once during aranya kanda.
But he that night-walker arrogant as he is by his might has uplifted Rama and Lakshmana like babies by that might and courage alone, and placed them on his shoulders as one would place babies. [3-3-24] Verse Locator तौ आरोप्य ततः स्कन्धम् राघवो रजनी चरः | विराधो विनदन् घोरम् जगाम अभिमुखो वनम् || ३-३-२५ 25. tataH = then; rajanii charaH = night, walker; Viradha; tau raaaghavau skandham aaropya = them, Raghava-s, on shoulders, having mounted; ghoram vinadan jagaama abhimukam vanam = very luridly, on yelling gone, towards, forest. That nightwalker Viradha on placing those two Raghava-s on his shoulders gone towards deeper forest yelling very luridly. [3-3-25]
http://www.valmikiramayan.net/utf8/aranya/sarga3/aranya_3_frame.htm 
      • Viswavasu - He proved his superiority over Lakshmana when the latter was begging to Rama for a rescue. He would kick hanuman’s ass.
And soon they beheld a headless Rakshasa of terrible mien. And that Rakshasa was dark as the clouds and huge as a mountain, with shoulders broad as those of a Sola tree, and with arms that were gigantic. And he had a pair of large eyes on his breast, and the opening of his mouth was placed on his capacious belly. And that Rakshasa seized Lakshmana by the hand, without any difficulty. And seized by the Rakshasa the son of Sumitra, O Bharata, became utterly confounded and helpless. And casting his glances on Rama, that headless Rakshasa began to draw Lakshmana towards that part of his body where his mouth was. And Lakshmana in grief addressed Rama, saying, 'Behold my plight! The loss of thy kingdom, and then the death of our father, and then the abduction of Sita, and finally this disaster that hath overwhelmed me! Alas, I shall not behold thee return with the princess of Videha to Kosala and seated on thy ancestral throne as the ruler of the entire Earth! They only that are fortunate will behold thy face, like unto the moon emerged from the clouds, after thy coronation bath in water sanctified with Kusa grass and fried paddy and black peas!' And the intelligent Lakshmana uttered those and other lamentations in the same strain. The illustrious descendant, however, of Kakutstha's race undaunted amid danger, replied unto Lakshmana, saying, 'Do not, O tiger among men, give way to grief! What is this thing when I am here? Cut thou off his right arm and I shall cut off his left.'
http://www.sacred-texts.com/hin/m03/m03277.htm
      • Kumbhakarna - the same arrow that killed Vali could not do anything to Kumbhakarna
Quote:
यैः सायकैः सालवरा निकृत्ता | वाली हतो वानरपुङ्गवश् च | ते कुम्भकर्णस्य तदा शरीरं | वज्रोपमा न व्यथयां प्रचक्रुः || ६-६७-१५४ 154. yaiH saayakaiH = by which arrows; saala varaaH = excellent Sala trees; nikR^ittaah = were chopped off; valii = and Vali; vaanara pungavaH = the foremost among monkeys; hataH = was killed; te = those arrows; tadaa = then; na vyathayaamprakruH = could not torment; kumbhakarNasya shariiram = Kumbhakarna's body; vajropamam = which can be compared to a thunderbolt. Those arrows, which chopped off the Sala trees and killed Vali the foremost of monkeys, could not torment Kumbhakarna's body which was like a thunderbolt. 155. piban = sucking; taan saayakaan = those arrows; shariireNa = with his body; vaaridhaaraaH iva = (as mountains would) suck up torrents of water; saH mahendra shatruH = that Kumbhakarna; vyavidhya = flourishing; mudgaram = his hammer; ugravegam = with terrible speed; jaghaana = hindered; shara pravegam = the tremendous speed of arrows; raamasya = of Rama. Sucking those arrows with his body, as mountains suck up torments of water, that Kumbhakarna, flourishing his hammer with terrible speed, hindered the tremendous speed of Rama's arrows.
Kumbhakarna even defeated Hanuman in direct warfare:
Holding firmly the spike, which was bright as lightning and looking like a blazing mountain-peak, Kumbhakarna struck Hanuma on his chest, as Guha (the son of Shiva) struck Krauncha mountain with his powerful javelin. 20. saH hanumaan = that hanuma; shuula nirbhinna mahaabhujaantaraH = struck in his broad chest by the spike; mahaahave = in that great battle; pravihvalaH= was highly perturbed; udvaman = and vomiting; shoNitam = blood; mukhaat = from his mouth; nanaada = roared; bhiimam = awfully; yugaantameghastanita svanopamam = like the sound of thunderous clouds at the time of dissolution of the world. That Hanuma, struck in his broad chest by the spike in that great combat, was highly perturbed and while vomiting blood from his mouth, awfully roared like the sound of thunderous clouds at the time of dissolution of the world. 21. samiikSya = looking at; tam = Hanuma; vyathitam = perturbed; rakSogaNaaH = all the troops of demons; tataH = then; sahasaa = suddenly; vineduH = shouted; prahR^iSTaaH = with rejoice; plavangamaastu = the monkeys; on their part; vyathitaaH = felt restless; bhayaartaah = and oppressed with fear; pradudruvuH= ran away; kumbhakarNaat = from Kumbhakarna; samyati = in the battle. Looking at the perturbed Hanuma, all the troops of demons then suddenly shouted with rejoice. The monkeys, on their part, felt restless and being oppressed with fear, ran away from the battle-field.
Source: http://www.valmikiramayan.net/utf8/yuddha/sarga67/yuddha_67_frame.htm
      • Vali - we all know that he is superior to Sugriva who is superior to hanuman.
He was praised by a mountain king from aryavarta named “Himavat” who was also the father-in law of Shiva:
"Approach him promptly if you desire a fight now, and he is an intrepid one who will always be in the manoeuvres of war, and indeed none can assail him." Thus said Himavan to that demon Dundubhi. [4-11-23]
Vali is an undefeated vanar, the only undefeated warrior of Ramayana. He never lost a single fight:
74. shuuraH ca shuura maanii ca = intrepid, also, his intrepidity, he esteems, also; prakhyaata bala pauruSaH = well, renowned, by might, tenacity; balavaan vaanaraH vaalii = mighty one, monkey, Vali; samyugeSu a paraajitaH = in combats, not, defeated. "Vali is a mighty monkey, an intrepid one, who esteems his own intrepidity, and one who is well renowned by his might and tenacity, and in combats he is an undefeated one. [4-11-74]
Vali tortured Sugriva.
11. tvayaa = by you; nirastasya = who is undone; visheSataH piiDitasya = especially, tortured; tasya = such a one; iha punaH etya = to here, again, on coming,; aahvaanam = inviting you - for duel; me shankaam janayati iva = to me, doubt, causing, like that. "He who is undone earlier by you, particularly after torturing by you, his coming here again and inviting you for a duel is causing a doubt in me. [4-15-11]
Vali had multiple wives, not just Tara/Ruma/Roma. While Hanuman did not even have one single patni.
22. vaanara iishvara = oh, vanara-s, lord; evam = this way; pra lapatiim = highly, one who is prattling; priyaam = to dear one; maam = to me; tvam kim na abhi bhaaSase = you, why, not, talk to me; te bahvayaH varaaH bhaaryaaH = your, several, comely, wives; imaaH = here they are; pashya = you see. ""Oh, lord of monkeys, why do not you talk to me, the dear wife of yours, when I am prattling at length, by the way, several of your comely wives are here, they are here, see them." Thus Tara lamented. [4-20-22]
http://www.valmikiramayan.net/utf8/kish/sarga20/kishkindha_20_frame.htm He never ran away from any fight like Karna did, sugriva did even hanumana fled like a kutta but Vali did not.
21. saa vrajantii = she, while advancing - trudging; atha = then; daanava indraaNaam = demons, arch-; hantaaram = destroyer of; samareSu a nivartinaam = in combats, back, coming - not, retreating; bhuvi nipatitam = on ground, fallen down; patim dadarsha = husband, she saw. While she is still trudging then she saw her husband who is the destroyer of arch-demons like Maayaavi and Dundubhi, and who never retreated in combats, but now fallen down on ground. [4-19-21]
http://www.valmikiramayan.net/utf8/kish/sarga19/kishkindha_19_frame.htm 
      • Mahaparsva defeated Hanuman in one second & made him vomit blood.
Then Mahápárs'va burned with ire; Fierce flashed his eyes with vengeful fire. A moment on the dead he gazed, Then his black mace aloft was raised, And down the mass of iron came That struck and shook the Vánar's frame. Hanúmán's chest was wellnigh crushed, And from his mouth red torrents gushed:
http://www.sacred-texts.com/hin/rama/ry466.htm
Indra also defeated hanuman:
"Oh, mighty monkey, even on seeing you who are coming near the vault of heaven, Indra is captivated by anger and by his effulgence he catapulted his Thunderbolt at you... [4-66-23] "Then, your left cheekbone, zygomatic arch, is broken when you fell down on a highest mountaintop, from thereupon your name-phrase is indeed averred as Hanumaan... [4-66-24] " "Then on observing that you are mutilated, highly infuriated is that scent-wafter Air-god and that tempestuous Air-god has not physically circulated throughout the triad of worlds... [4-66-25]
http://www.valmikiramayan.net/kishkindha/sarga66/kishkindha_66_frame.htm
Hanuman was mutilated, and never fought back against Indra, Indra is clearly the man that won this fight. He wasn't a baby here either.
Hanuman is not a immortal or a chiranjeevi:
"Oh, ablest Hanuma, the Thousand-eyed Indra kind-heartedly gave you a choicest boon saying that your death occurs only by your own volition... [4-66-28, 29a]
It's clearly stated that he wiill die by violation. Here is evidence - http://www.valmikiramayan.net/kishkindha/sarga66/kishkindha_66_frame.htm

Wednesday, October 10, 2018

The reasons why Pakistan is better than india.

No Pakistani does shit like this - https://indianexpress.com/article/india/rajasthan-minister-shambhu-singh-khetasar-urinates-in-open-5392145/?fbclid=IwAR0dsOtmkWiWzrgfe02MFs5-pVKVaR0iDouUHAmDwjflyO3OIH56CHJhDrA
  • 1) Pakistan has more nuclear weapons.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_states_with_nuclear_weapons#Statistics_and_force_configuration Over here we see Russia at the top, then USA, after that comes France, next in line is China, then their British masters, then Pakistan, and then india after india comes israel. So leave aside France & China, or even our british masters...... india doesn't even have as many nuclear weapons as PAKISTAN DOES!
    • Pakistan is also superior to india in military might.
Proof that India does not make any of it's own weapons but gets it from other countries! https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YhXfQda40Ds India is not strong or developed because it can't make sh!t on it's own. India just begs for weapons, like brahmins beg for alms.
Proof the indian military is lagging far behind other countries, the military cannot protect india, the country of india is a sitting duck to terrorist attacks like 26/11 etc https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gb95mhkE5Bw it is inferior to countries like France, UK, Russia, USA, China, Pakistan etc.
    • It is pakistan who won the kargil war not india.
How pakistan defeated india - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=w1bzxYvw8Uo 
      • Pakistan even humiliated India in the Kargil war that india supposedly won. Pakistani army not only succeeded in their aim to show the world that LOC isn't the final border but also managed to capture multiple points including the most important Point 5353, a strategically important peak in the Dras sector, which is still under pakistani control. Thehindu.com/2004/06/30/stories/2004063006391100.htm
  • 2) Pakistan has more beautiful/physically attractive citizens.
it's so sad that no matter who wins, Pakistanis will continue to be way hotter than us and we'll continue to be their ugly neighbours — Rega Jha (@RegaJha) February 15, 2015
"In absolute terms, 41.6 per cent of India's 1.1 billion people earned less than 78 pence per day compared with 22.6 per cent of Pakistan's 173 million. The report quotes its 'multi-dimensional poverty index' which includes measures of schooling, child mortality, nutrition, access to electricity, toilets, drinking water, and hygienic living conditions, and reveals India is poorer."
"It found 53.7 per cent of Indians suffering from this broader kind of poverty, compared with 49 per cent of Pakistanis."
More proof of india being poorer than pakistan - https://www.quora.com/Why-India-has-such-a-high-poverty-rate-compared-to-Pakistan-when-they-gained-independence-simultaneously/answer/Ayush-Raj-187
"There is far less poverty on show in Pakistan than in India, fewer beggars, and much less desperation." https://www.theguardian.com/world/2007/aug/14/pakistan.india1
"In many ways the infrastructure of Pakistan is much more advanced: there are better roads and airports, and more reliable electricity." https://www.theguardian.com/world/2007/aug/14/pakistan.india1
"Middle-class Pakistani houses are often bigger and better appointed than their equivalents in India." https://www.theguardian.com/world/2007/aug/14/pakistan.india1
Pakistan also has more contribution of agriculture in the world, 25 % of the agriculture products come from Pakistan while 14% comes from India, despite being more unemployed than india, pakistan is still able to outdo india in quality of life, economy, and producing.
  • 5) The people living in Pakistan are happier than the people living in India.
  • 6) Pakistan defeated India in a game of cricket in 2017.
  • 7) Pakistan has far richer and older history than India.
    • The indus river valley is in Pakistan.
    • The first university of the world (Taxila) is from Pakistan.
    • The king porus's ancestors were pakistanis of jhelum river.
The only time the Indus Region was united with India was for 80 years under Buddhist Ashoka, 400 or so under foreign Mughals/Turkics and 98 under British. They have had different kingdoms apart from that. Pakistan is genetically, culturally, historically and linguistically seperate from Indians. Thats a FACT.
  • 8) Pakistan is the birthplace of the man that started sikhism a new religion that is prevalent in india. Sikhism originated in Pakistan.
    • Guru Nanak was born in Lahore, Pakistan.
The Punjabi spoken in Pakistan is the oldest, richest and the one with most literature. Baba Farid, Waris Shah, Bulleh Shah etc. all wrote their epics here and all major Punjabi literature like Heer Ranjha, Mirza Sahiban, Sassi Punnu, Sohni Mahiwal etc. is written in these lands in Shahmukhi. Indian Punjabi mix their words with Hindi words as well. You should remember that Farsi has been the second language of Punjab after Punjabi for a long time, the Sikh Gurus used it, it was the official language in Ranjit Singhs time, the Achaemenids, Kushans, Parthian, Scythian etc. influenced Farsi in Punjab as well (this was all pre-Islamic). Also, the Punjabi identity is really Pakistani since they form a majority in Pakistan and form only 2% of India. Pak Punjab is also quite bigger than Indian Punjab and it actually has five rivers (Panj Ab) unlike Indian Punjab with two rivers (which is Do Ab). http://dailysikhupdates.com/rare-sikh-heritage-gurdwara-discovered-pakistans-jhelum/
"A decade after the month-long outbreak of violence that resulted in the killing of **atleast 2,000** women, men and children, mostly Muslims, and the rape of significant numbers of women and girls, in the western Indian state of Gujarat, India's authorities are yet to bring justice to the majority of victims, Amnesty International said today." https://www.amnesty.org/download/Documents/20000/asa200062012en.pdf
More surprisingly, India is ranked below Pakistan and Bangladesh on gender equality which reflects maternal death rates, teenage pregnancies, access to education, and the number of women parliamentarians and in the workplace. "It is things like healthcare and education which have India lagging behind Pakistan, Bangladesh, Nepal and Sri Lanka. These countries are well on track and India, with its fast growing economy, has still not got its act together," she said. "While we have a new band of millionaires, on the other side people continue to suffer endlessly. Millions still live below the poverty line and go to sleep hungry. The [economic] growth has not flowed towards them," she added.
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/asia/india/8867353/Indian-poverty-levels-higher-than-Pakistans-says-UN-report.html
Most of Pakistan has less than 500 people living in every square kilometer - http://www.angelfire.com/super2/geopak/density.jpg pakistan is 50-500 while india is 200 - 500 so their cannot be less than 200 people living in a kilometer of india their will always be at-least two hundred people.
It has controlled it's population unlike india who has over 200 people living in every square kilometer - https://www.mapsofindia.com/census2011/india-population-density-map.jpg they can never even dream of having just 50 citizens in one square kilometer. Overpopulation is a bad thing, more resources are wasted, lesser space to live, lesser food, shelter, clothing for everyone, more divison, more desires of people, more conflict.

  • 12) India is more corrupt than Pakistan

Hitler is reviled all over the world for his genocidal ways and pursuit of aryan supremacy, but among hindus like you, he is a considered a great aryan leader, despite him having gassed thousands of your fellow inferior aryans. And Hindu politicians like thackerays and modi have never shied away from emulating him and his actions. Timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/Modis-Gujarat-worships-Hitler/articleshow/1180426.cms

Drona's power.

Normal. Day 11: "Arjuna and Prishata's son, along with their followers, all received Drona as the latter came. And the Kekaya princ...