Over fifty thousand years ago India (land now known as "India") was already being invaded by outsiders:
"The team found evidence that people began colonizing India more than 50,000 years ago and that there were multiple waves of migration into India from the northwest over the last 20,000 years, including waves of people from Anatolia, the Caucasus and Iran between 9,000 and 5,000 years ago."
North Indian men have different genes as compared to south indians:
"The genetic makeup of the Y chromosome dramatically shifted about 4,000 to 3,800 years ago, the study found. About 17.5 percent of Indian men carry a Y-chromosome subtype, or haplogroup, known as R1, with the haplogroup more dominant in men in the north compared to the south of India."
Men that historians labelled "yamnaya" had more children than the local men did due to alpha male status and bad boy image:
"One possibility is that a group of horse-riding warriors swept across India, murdered the men and raped or took local women as wives" "the men were either able to acquire (or started out with) higher status than local males and thus sired more children with local women"
Outside of modern india/pakistan people came to settle in what was the indus river valley:
"Sometime around 6000 BCE a nomadic herding people settled into villages just west of the Indus River. There they created order for themselves, growing barley and wheat using sickles with flint blades, and they lived in small houses built with adobe bricks."
http://www.fsmitha.com/h1/ch05.htm Their culture was not a indian culture.
Outsiders entered:
Aryans entry:
"It has been estimated by various scholars that between 1500 and 1200 an illiterate, pastoral people migrated from the northwest, perhaps across the steppe lands of what is now central Russia, through Afghanistan, through the Khyber Pass and onto the Indus Plain. These migrants were to be called Aryans and to be classified as Indo-Europeans, their speech related to modern European languages except Basque, Finnish and Hungarian."
http://www.fsmitha.com/h1/ch05kyber.htm
Either their were already some aryans their and more aryans entered after the destruction of mohenjo-daro, or maybe aryans were looking for an opportunity to enter the sub-continent to settle their after the former citizens die.
Aryan culture was similar to the hyksos that invaded egypt a few years before the indus valley was ruined and was not a fake bharatiya culture:
"The Aryans had a horse culture, and no evidence exists of horses among the many representations of animals of the lost Harappan civilization. It is believed by some that like other pastoral people, the Aryans were warriors. They had two-wheeled chariots like the Hyksos that they packed away on carts pulled by oxen."
http://www.fsmitha.com/h1/ch05kyber.htm
Theory: Maybe in the 1700s the aryans left russia/south-eastern europe or maybe central asia/kazakhstan (modern day) to settle in hotter places, invaded egypt, then after ruling for a few hundred years and being kicked out the aryans invaded indus or choose to migrate to other places for years until they found the indus valley uninhabited.
https://www.historynet.com/first-aryan-blitzkrieg.htm (proof they were aryans)
Their culture was similar to the family culture of Kshatriyas in Mahabharata:
"The Aryans were familiar with prowling and hunting with bow and arrow. They enjoyed chariot racing, gambling and fighting. Like other pastoral peoples, men dominated the women. Like the pastoral Hebrews each family was ruled by an authoritarian male. And each Aryan tribe was ruled by a king who felt obliged to consult with tribal councils."
http://www.fsmitha.com/h1/ch05kyber.htm
Examples - Sakuni, Duryodhan, Yudhishthir loved gambling. Pandavas and Kauravas dominated their wives, authoritarian men were leaders of families.
Bhishma talks about aryan culture:
The wise have directed that when an accomplished person has been invited, a maiden may be bestowed on him, decked with ornaments and along with many valuable presents. Others again may bestow their daughters by accepting a couple of kine. Some again bestow their daughters by taking a fixed sum, and some take away maidens by force.
https://www.sacred-texts.com/hin/m01/m01103.htm This is how women are treated.
When scythians adopted the aryan culture and became rajputs they sold their daughters to mughals.
Later on these aryans compared themselves to gods (many years before the nanda dynasty):
"Gradually, Aryan tribal kings were changing from tribal leaders to autocratic rulers. They had begun associating their power with the powers of their gods rather than the approval of their fellow tribesmen and had begun allying themselves with priests. And, as in West Asia, kings were acquiring divinity."
http://www.fsmitha.com/h1/ch05kyber.htm
My views: Regarding how conquerors & kings (alexander, sargon) called themselves "descendants of god/divine beings" it's obvious that this was a norm/custom of many kings around the continent (africa, russia, asia, europe, india each are connected as a huge land mass).
Like how Pandavs & Kauravs used other kingdoms/tribes to fight their war for them in Kurukshetra so did the Aryans, they did the same thing:
"By taxing their subjects, these kings could create an army that was theirs rather than an instrument of the tribe. These armies formed a horse-owning aristocracy and were sometimes led in combat by the king, who identified himself grandly as a warrior."
http://www.fsmitha.com/h1/ch05kyber.htm
Aryans would justify deaths of their enemies by claiming the previous inhabitants of this land were demons:
"Hinduism's Vedas saw evil as the work of demons that might take the form of a human or some other creature, which could be removed by the prayers and rituals of priests."
http://www.fsmitha.com/h1/religion-india.htm
Examples - they say Duryodhan was a demon incarnated of kali and his brothers were the sons of pulastya, while ravan's murder is justified due to him being a enemy of Rama (a revered figure).
When Ravan abducts a woman it matters as a sin, but when Bhishma, Karna, Krishna, Duryodhana each abduct women then it never matters. No Rama came to kill or slay a Karna, Krishna, Duryodhana for abduction.
Krishna abducting a woman:
"Of eyes like the lotus petals, and endued with great bravery, Krishna, vanquishing all the kings at a self-choice, bore away the daughter of the king of the Gandharas. Those angry kings, as if they were horses by birth, were yoked unto his nuptial car and were lacerated with the whip."
https://www.sacred-texts.com/hin/m07/m07011.htm
Duryodhan abducting a woman:
"Intoxicated with the pride of energy, and relying upon Bhishma and Drona, king Duryodhana, taking up that maiden on his car, abducted her with force."
https://www.sacred-texts.com/hin/m12/m12a004.htm
Bhishma abducting women:
"Vanquishing on a single car all the assembled Kshatriyas of the world at the Swayamvara of the daughters of the ruler of Kasi, I abducted those maidens."
https://www.sacred-texts.com/hin/m05/m05169.htm
Karna abducting:
"O Karna, proceeding to the city of Kasi, alone with thy bow, thou hadst crushed the kings in battle for procuring a bride for the Kuru king!"
https://www.sacred-texts.com/hin/m06/m06124.htm
No one cared when an aryan abused a woman.
Caste system would be imposed where the conquered people or any native alive would be termed a sudra/dasa:
"Jyotiba Phule argued that the dasas and sudras were indigenous people and the rightful inheritors of the land, whereas Brahmins were Aryan and alien."
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Indigenous_Aryans#Colonial_India
Their was a single origin for Sanskrit, Latin & Greek languages these languages were a part of the same one until through the influence of time & maybe migration this language had variations which led to three new ones (Sanskrit, Greek, Latin):
"When similarities between Sanskrit, Greek and Latin were discovered by William Jones, a suggestion of "monogenesis" (single origin) was formulated for these languages as well as their speakers. In the latter part of the 19th century, it was thought that language, culture and race were inter-related, and the notion of biological race came to the forefront. The presumed "Aryan race" which originated the Indo-European languages was prominent among such races, and was deduced to be further subdivided into "European Aryans" and "Asian Aryans," each with their own homelands."
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Indigenous_Aryans#Colonial_India It was most likely used by ancient aryans.
Sanskrit was not native to india:
"The new data confirm a long-held but controversial theory that Sanskrit, the ancient language of Northern India, emerged from an earlier language spoken by an influx of people from Central Asia during the Bronze Age."
https://www.livescience.com/59703-north-india-populated-by-central-asian-invaders.html
Aryans came into power in other places as well but they were small groups of ancient aryans that changed their culture over time (the gods in their culture were also the ones mentioned in Mahabharat/Ramayan):
"The more direct evidence comes from Northern Syria where there is a treaty between the Hittites and the Mitannis, two groups of people, and in the course of this treaty they call to witness the gods of Hittites - Mitra, Varuna, Indra, Nasatya. They are actually written as Mitrashil, Uruvanshil, Indurah, Nashatyana. But they have been used as versions of what later became Mitra, Varuna, Indra and Nasatya. So that is one little bit of evidence of fleeting Indo-Aryan presence in Mesopotamia and Syria."
http://ascjnu.tripod.com/aryan.html It did not come from modern day India neither were Aryans native to india.
Rors is a modern day caste in northern india and in south asia they are the population with the highest proprtion of steppe ancestry:
https://www.cell.com/ajhg/pdfExtended/S0002-9297(18)30398-7
People of the middle east share a deep connection with those of modern day india and an even deeper connection with the caucasian aryans from as early as 23 thousand BCE (this was before the art of inbreeding and cousin marriages occured) they had aryan genotype:
"Their genomes showed that a continued mixture of the Caucasians with Middle Eastern took place up to 25,000 years ago, when the coldest period in the last Ice Age started"
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Yamnaya_culture#Near_East_population
Genetic history of some indians:
"Sengupta, S. et al. Polarity and temporality of high-resolution y-chromosome distributions in India identify both indigenous and exogenous expansions and reveal minor genetic influence of Central Asian pastoralists."
https://www.biorxiv.org/content/biorxiv/suppl/2016/06/16/059311.DC1/059311-1.pdf
This minor one would either be brahmin dna or perhaps the purest aryans in india, or maybe the rajputs who are descended from scythians, but this small part would have been larger in the ancient days. My point is just cause it's minor does not make it irrelevant.
Similarity in names of tribes:
"although they have also been referred to by the names Kaššu, Kassi, Kasi or Kashi."
Link: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kassites
Reasoning - although kashi is the name of a kingdom (in itself already a valid point) it is also the name of a tribe (kasis) they were referred many times in the Mahabharata by different characters. And they are or were everywhere (like most modern day indians), more common than you think. The word "kassites" in itself sounds like a different way of saying "kasis":
India was not the only victim of these aryans:
"During the 2nd millennium the long process began by which Indo-European peoples from the northern steppes beyond the Caucasus established themselves about Western Asia, Iran and northern India. Their earliest pressure perhaps drove some the native peoples of the mountains to migrate or infiltrate and sometimes come as invaders into Mesopotamia and northern Syria, even in the 3rd millennium."
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kassites#References
The exact translated word Kasis is mentioned 3 times on the 12th day of Kurukshetra war:
https://www.sacred-texts.com/hin/m07/m07023.htm it depends on if this tribe conquered babylon before or after the Mahabharata, maybe even during the same time.
Common belief of many historians & knowledgable people about the origin of vedic culture:
"A group of warrior nomads, the Aryans, began to migrate into the Indus Valley region around the time that the Harappan Civilization began to decline. Scholars disagree about whether the Aryans overtook the Harappan Civilization by force, or simply moved in and coexisted with them during their decline. Regardless, the nomadic Aryans were predominately a cattle-breeding society, and they learned how to live as settled agriculturists from the remaining Harappan people. Therefore, the Aryans absorbed remnants of the Harappan Civilization and integrated them into their own culture to form the Vedic culture."
http://www.thenagain.info/WebChron/India/AryanMig.html
Aryans started a caste system in India:
Mahabharat proves it:
"The complexion the Brahmanas obtained was white; that which the Kshatriyas obtained was red; that which the Vaisyas got was yellow; and that which was given to the Sudras was black."
https://www.sacred-texts.com/hin/m12/m12b015.htm
Those with dark skin are considered low caste & untouchable shudra.
Central asians could be the Aryans who invaded india:
"An influx of men from the steppe of Central Asia may have swept into India around 3,500 years ago and transformed the population." "The same mysterious people (ancient livestock herders called the Yamnaya who rode wheeled chariots and spoke a proto-Indo-European language) also moved across Europe."
https://www.livescience.com/59703-north-india-populated-by-central-asian-invaders.html
Distribution of similar languages that have the same origin:
R1a1 shows a strong correlation with the distribution of the Indo-European languages in Europe and South Asia, being most prevalent in Poland, Russia, and Ukraine, and in central Asia, Afghanistan, Pakistan and India.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Proto-Indo-European_homeland#Genetics
Whether the indus was abandoned or destroyed through floods is debatable however what is not debatable is that it was replaced by aryan civilizations:
"The Indus Valley Civilisation was localised, that is, urban centers disappeared and were replaced by local cultures, due to a climatic change that is also signalled for the neighbouring areas of the Middle East."
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Indo-Aryan_migration#Ecology
The Aryans who settled in india may have come from the danube river:
"Between 4200 and 3900 BCE many tell settlements in the lower Danube Valley were burned and abandoned"
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Indo-Aryan_migration#Ecology
Languages changed in India:
"Evidence in material culture for systems collapse, abandonment of old beliefs and large-scale, if localised, population shifts in response to ecological catastrophe in the 2nd millennium B.C. must all now be related to the spread of Indo-Aryan languages."
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Indo-Aryan_migration#First_wave_%E2%80%93_Indo-Aryan_migrations
Language of people before (indus river valley citizens) aryans was not understandable:
https://www.discovermagazine.com/planet-earth/why-we-still-cant-read-the-writing-of-the-ancient-indus-civilization This is clearly not sanskrit or aryan language.
Aryans got to mongoloids in central asia (so them getting to india isn't unbelievable):
"Initially, when only a few number of skulls from Wusun territory were known, the Wusun were recognized as a Caucasoid people with slight Mongoloid admixture."
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wusun#Physical_appearance
Brahmins are not from India:
Brahmin's opressed india dividing indians into more than a thousand castes:
"With the help of the genetic science, Indians also wanted to know as how Brahmins created the castes and how they divided the majority of Indians into 6000 different castes and how they ruled on them instead of being in minority"
https://beyondheadlines.in/2014/04/american-scientist-proves-brahmins-are-foreigners/
Due to the common genetic material it's possible that the higher castes have married their cousins:
However; DNA of the Brahmins, Kshatriyas and Vaishyas matched completely among their own peoples.
https://beyondheadlines.in/2014/04/american-scientist-proves-brahmins-are-foreigners/
Possible route taken by the former aryans:
Why is it so hard to find evidence:
India is a region that has went through many cultural changes/transformations in the past 2500 years, which is why hardly anyone remembered whenever an invasion happened before the british invaded. How can you expect a vast amount of evidence for 3500 years prior to this day?
Languages:
Ryan (common european/western name) - Aryan (nobles) - Narayan (god of aryavarth) - Aryavarth (land ruled by the Aryans) which is now the modern indian states of "maharasthra, rajputana, punjab, haryana, kashmir, uttar pradesh, himachal pradesh, odissa". Haryana - derived from aryan & hari.
Porus (aryan king) - Persia (land of zoroastrians) - Prussia (german state the name of porus originated from such language) - Russia (original aryans possibly came from southern russia, it would be their earliest known location).
Iran - Ryan - Aryan
This has nothing to do with nationalism or religous attacks, no one cares about those things, people who consider aryan invasion true are those that want to know the truth that are interested in reality unlike the blind patriots and those who don't know the origins of religion.
Aryans (paternal ancestors of most hindus) were not indigenous (native) to india (modern day) at all!
Aryan look alikes:
I have no problem in saying i believe in the aryan invasion theory.
"Sometime around 6000 BCE a nomadic herding people settled into villages just west of the Indus River. There they created order for themselves, growing barley and wheat using sickles with flint blades, and they lived in small houses built with adobe bricks."
http://www.fsmitha.com/h1/ch05.htm Their culture was not a indian culture.
Outsiders entered:
Agriculture declined and people abandoned their cities in search of food. Later, a few people of a different culture settled in some of the abandoned cities, in what archaeologists call a "squatter period."http://www.fsmitha.com/h1/ch05.htm
Aryans entry:
"It has been estimated by various scholars that between 1500 and 1200 an illiterate, pastoral people migrated from the northwest, perhaps across the steppe lands of what is now central Russia, through Afghanistan, through the Khyber Pass and onto the Indus Plain. These migrants were to be called Aryans and to be classified as Indo-Europeans, their speech related to modern European languages except Basque, Finnish and Hungarian."
http://www.fsmitha.com/h1/ch05kyber.htm
Either their were already some aryans their and more aryans entered after the destruction of mohenjo-daro, or maybe aryans were looking for an opportunity to enter the sub-continent to settle their after the former citizens die.
Aryan culture was similar to the hyksos that invaded egypt a few years before the indus valley was ruined and was not a fake bharatiya culture:
"The Aryans had a horse culture, and no evidence exists of horses among the many representations of animals of the lost Harappan civilization. It is believed by some that like other pastoral people, the Aryans were warriors. They had two-wheeled chariots like the Hyksos that they packed away on carts pulled by oxen."
http://www.fsmitha.com/h1/ch05kyber.htm
Theory: Maybe in the 1700s the aryans left russia/south-eastern europe or maybe central asia/kazakhstan (modern day) to settle in hotter places, invaded egypt, then after ruling for a few hundred years and being kicked out the aryans invaded indus or choose to migrate to other places for years until they found the indus valley uninhabited.
https://www.historynet.com/first-aryan-blitzkrieg.htm (proof they were aryans)
Their culture was similar to the family culture of Kshatriyas in Mahabharata:
"The Aryans were familiar with prowling and hunting with bow and arrow. They enjoyed chariot racing, gambling and fighting. Like other pastoral peoples, men dominated the women. Like the pastoral Hebrews each family was ruled by an authoritarian male. And each Aryan tribe was ruled by a king who felt obliged to consult with tribal councils."
http://www.fsmitha.com/h1/ch05kyber.htm
Examples - Sakuni, Duryodhan, Yudhishthir loved gambling. Pandavas and Kauravas dominated their wives, authoritarian men were leaders of families.
Bhishma talks about aryan culture:
The wise have directed that when an accomplished person has been invited, a maiden may be bestowed on him, decked with ornaments and along with many valuable presents. Others again may bestow their daughters by accepting a couple of kine. Some again bestow their daughters by taking a fixed sum, and some take away maidens by force.
https://www.sacred-texts.com/hin/m01/m01103.htm This is how women are treated.
When scythians adopted the aryan culture and became rajputs they sold their daughters to mughals.
Later on these aryans compared themselves to gods (many years before the nanda dynasty):
"Gradually, Aryan tribal kings were changing from tribal leaders to autocratic rulers. They had begun associating their power with the powers of their gods rather than the approval of their fellow tribesmen and had begun allying themselves with priests. And, as in West Asia, kings were acquiring divinity."
http://www.fsmitha.com/h1/ch05kyber.htm
My views: Regarding how conquerors & kings (alexander, sargon) called themselves "descendants of god/divine beings" it's obvious that this was a norm/custom of many kings around the continent (africa, russia, asia, europe, india each are connected as a huge land mass).
Like how Pandavs & Kauravs used other kingdoms/tribes to fight their war for them in Kurukshetra so did the Aryans, they did the same thing:
"By taxing their subjects, these kings could create an army that was theirs rather than an instrument of the tribe. These armies formed a horse-owning aristocracy and were sometimes led in combat by the king, who identified himself grandly as a warrior."
http://www.fsmitha.com/h1/ch05kyber.htm
Aryans would justify deaths of their enemies by claiming the previous inhabitants of this land were demons:
"Hinduism's Vedas saw evil as the work of demons that might take the form of a human or some other creature, which could be removed by the prayers and rituals of priests."
http://www.fsmitha.com/h1/religion-india.htm
Examples - they say Duryodhan was a demon incarnated of kali and his brothers were the sons of pulastya, while ravan's murder is justified due to him being a enemy of Rama (a revered figure).
When Ravan abducts a woman it matters as a sin, but when Bhishma, Karna, Krishna, Duryodhana each abduct women then it never matters. No Rama came to kill or slay a Karna, Krishna, Duryodhana for abduction.
Krishna abducting a woman:
"Of eyes like the lotus petals, and endued with great bravery, Krishna, vanquishing all the kings at a self-choice, bore away the daughter of the king of the Gandharas. Those angry kings, as if they were horses by birth, were yoked unto his nuptial car and were lacerated with the whip."
https://www.sacred-texts.com/hin/m07/m07011.htm
Duryodhan abducting a woman:
"Intoxicated with the pride of energy, and relying upon Bhishma and Drona, king Duryodhana, taking up that maiden on his car, abducted her with force."
https://www.sacred-texts.com/hin/m12/m12a004.htm
Bhishma abducting women:
"Vanquishing on a single car all the assembled Kshatriyas of the world at the Swayamvara of the daughters of the ruler of Kasi, I abducted those maidens."
https://www.sacred-texts.com/hin/m05/m05169.htm
Karna abducting:
"O Karna, proceeding to the city of Kasi, alone with thy bow, thou hadst crushed the kings in battle for procuring a bride for the Kuru king!"
https://www.sacred-texts.com/hin/m06/m06124.htm
No one cared when an aryan abused a woman.
Caste system would be imposed where the conquered people or any native alive would be termed a sudra/dasa:
"Jyotiba Phule argued that the dasas and sudras were indigenous people and the rightful inheritors of the land, whereas Brahmins were Aryan and alien."
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Indigenous_Aryans#Colonial_India
Their was a single origin for Sanskrit, Latin & Greek languages these languages were a part of the same one until through the influence of time & maybe migration this language had variations which led to three new ones (Sanskrit, Greek, Latin):
"When similarities between Sanskrit, Greek and Latin were discovered by William Jones, a suggestion of "monogenesis" (single origin) was formulated for these languages as well as their speakers. In the latter part of the 19th century, it was thought that language, culture and race were inter-related, and the notion of biological race came to the forefront. The presumed "Aryan race" which originated the Indo-European languages was prominent among such races, and was deduced to be further subdivided into "European Aryans" and "Asian Aryans," each with their own homelands."
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Indigenous_Aryans#Colonial_India It was most likely used by ancient aryans.
Sanskrit was not native to india:
"The new data confirm a long-held but controversial theory that Sanskrit, the ancient language of Northern India, emerged from an earlier language spoken by an influx of people from Central Asia during the Bronze Age."
https://www.livescience.com/59703-north-india-populated-by-central-asian-invaders.html
Aryans came into power in other places as well but they were small groups of ancient aryans that changed their culture over time (the gods in their culture were also the ones mentioned in Mahabharat/Ramayan):
"The more direct evidence comes from Northern Syria where there is a treaty between the Hittites and the Mitannis, two groups of people, and in the course of this treaty they call to witness the gods of Hittites - Mitra, Varuna, Indra, Nasatya. They are actually written as Mitrashil, Uruvanshil, Indurah, Nashatyana. But they have been used as versions of what later became Mitra, Varuna, Indra and Nasatya. So that is one little bit of evidence of fleeting Indo-Aryan presence in Mesopotamia and Syria."
http://ascjnu.tripod.com/aryan.html It did not come from modern day India neither were Aryans native to india.
Rors is a modern day caste in northern india and in south asia they are the population with the highest proprtion of steppe ancestry:
https://www.cell.com/ajhg/pdfExtended/S0002-9297(18)30398-7
People of the middle east share a deep connection with those of modern day india and an even deeper connection with the caucasian aryans from as early as 23 thousand BCE (this was before the art of inbreeding and cousin marriages occured) they had aryan genotype:
"Their genomes showed that a continued mixture of the Caucasians with Middle Eastern took place up to 25,000 years ago, when the coldest period in the last Ice Age started"
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Yamnaya_culture#Near_East_population
Genetic history of some indians:
"Sengupta, S. et al. Polarity and temporality of high-resolution y-chromosome distributions in India identify both indigenous and exogenous expansions and reveal minor genetic influence of Central Asian pastoralists."
https://www.biorxiv.org/content/biorxiv/suppl/2016/06/16/059311.DC1/059311-1.pdf
This minor one would either be brahmin dna or perhaps the purest aryans in india, or maybe the rajputs who are descended from scythians, but this small part would have been larger in the ancient days. My point is just cause it's minor does not make it irrelevant.
Similarity in names of tribes:
"although they have also been referred to by the names Kaššu, Kassi, Kasi or Kashi."
Link: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kassites
Reasoning - although kashi is the name of a kingdom (in itself already a valid point) it is also the name of a tribe (kasis) they were referred many times in the Mahabharata by different characters. And they are or were everywhere (like most modern day indians), more common than you think. The word "kassites" in itself sounds like a different way of saying "kasis":
India was not the only victim of these aryans:
"During the 2nd millennium the long process began by which Indo-European peoples from the northern steppes beyond the Caucasus established themselves about Western Asia, Iran and northern India. Their earliest pressure perhaps drove some the native peoples of the mountains to migrate or infiltrate and sometimes come as invaders into Mesopotamia and northern Syria, even in the 3rd millennium."
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kassites#References
The exact translated word Kasis is mentioned 3 times on the 12th day of Kurukshetra war:
https://www.sacred-texts.com/hin/m07/m07023.htm it depends on if this tribe conquered babylon before or after the Mahabharata, maybe even during the same time.
Common belief of many historians & knowledgable people about the origin of vedic culture:
"A group of warrior nomads, the Aryans, began to migrate into the Indus Valley region around the time that the Harappan Civilization began to decline. Scholars disagree about whether the Aryans overtook the Harappan Civilization by force, or simply moved in and coexisted with them during their decline. Regardless, the nomadic Aryans were predominately a cattle-breeding society, and they learned how to live as settled agriculturists from the remaining Harappan people. Therefore, the Aryans absorbed remnants of the Harappan Civilization and integrated them into their own culture to form the Vedic culture."
http://www.thenagain.info/WebChron/India/AryanMig.html
Aryans started a caste system in India:
In the "Hymn to Parusha" in the "Rig Veda", the god Parusha sacrificed himself to himself, and out of his parts came the different classes of Indian peoples. This became the basis for the socially stratified caste system. Perhaps the Aryans used this creation myth to subjugate the darker-skinned people they conquered (the Harappans). Further, the Aryans saw themselves as superiors to the people they conquered as evidenced in the Indo-European root word of their name, "ar", meaning "noble" or "superior".http://www.thenagain.info/WebChron/India/AryanMig.html
Mahabharat proves it:
"The complexion the Brahmanas obtained was white; that which the Kshatriyas obtained was red; that which the Vaisyas got was yellow; and that which was given to the Sudras was black."
https://www.sacred-texts.com/hin/m12/m12b015.htm
Those with dark skin are considered low caste & untouchable shudra.
Central asians could be the Aryans who invaded india:
"An influx of men from the steppe of Central Asia may have swept into India around 3,500 years ago and transformed the population." "The same mysterious people (ancient livestock herders called the Yamnaya who rode wheeled chariots and spoke a proto-Indo-European language) also moved across Europe."
https://www.livescience.com/59703-north-india-populated-by-central-asian-invaders.html
Distribution of similar languages that have the same origin:
R1a1 shows a strong correlation with the distribution of the Indo-European languages in Europe and South Asia, being most prevalent in Poland, Russia, and Ukraine, and in central Asia, Afghanistan, Pakistan and India.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Proto-Indo-European_homeland#Genetics
Whether the indus was abandoned or destroyed through floods is debatable however what is not debatable is that it was replaced by aryan civilizations:
"The Indus Valley Civilisation was localised, that is, urban centers disappeared and were replaced by local cultures, due to a climatic change that is also signalled for the neighbouring areas of the Middle East."
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Indo-Aryan_migration#Ecology
The Aryans who settled in india may have come from the danube river:
"Between 4200 and 3900 BCE many tell settlements in the lower Danube Valley were burned and abandoned"
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Indo-Aryan_migration#Ecology
Languages changed in India:
"Evidence in material culture for systems collapse, abandonment of old beliefs and large-scale, if localised, population shifts in response to ecological catastrophe in the 2nd millennium B.C. must all now be related to the spread of Indo-Aryan languages."
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Indo-Aryan_migration#First_wave_%E2%80%93_Indo-Aryan_migrations
Language of people before (indus river valley citizens) aryans was not understandable:
https://www.discovermagazine.com/planet-earth/why-we-still-cant-read-the-writing-of-the-ancient-indus-civilization This is clearly not sanskrit or aryan language.
Aryans got to mongoloids in central asia (so them getting to india isn't unbelievable):
"Initially, when only a few number of skulls from Wusun territory were known, the Wusun were recognized as a Caucasoid people with slight Mongoloid admixture."
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wusun#Physical_appearance
Brahmins are not from India:
"Due to this DNA report it is proved scientifically that the Brahmins are foreigners in India but Brahmins are completely silent on this issue." "A scientific research has concluded after extensive study of DNAs of various castes in India that Brahmins are in fact foreigner to the country they have been ruling for thousands of years." "The World has now approved this fact that the Brahmins are foreigners in India. The Brahmins have enslaved all Indians by creating ignorance among them. However; now Brahmins can’t hide this fact that they are the foreigners because this fact is now highlighted all over the World. A well known scientist of Utah University named Michael Bamshad has tremendously indebted the entire native Indians by publishing this report at an international level."https://beyondheadlines.in/2014/04/american-scientist-proves-brahmins-are-foreigners/
Brahmin's opressed india dividing indians into more than a thousand castes:
"With the help of the genetic science, Indians also wanted to know as how Brahmins created the castes and how they divided the majority of Indians into 6000 different castes and how they ruled on them instead of being in minority"
https://beyondheadlines.in/2014/04/american-scientist-proves-brahmins-are-foreigners/
Most indians are sudra:
"The DNA of 85% aboriginal Indians didn’t matched that with the minority of the Brahmins, Kshatriyas and Vaishyas."
"this DNA report proclaims that, the higher Castes (i.e. the Brahmins, Kshatriyas and Vaishyas) are not the original residents of India but they are the foreigners."
https://beyondheadlines.in/2014/04/american-scientist-proves-brahmins-are-foreigners/Due to the common genetic material it's possible that the higher castes have married their cousins:
However; DNA of the Brahmins, Kshatriyas and Vaishyas matched completely among their own peoples.
https://beyondheadlines.in/2014/04/american-scientist-proves-brahmins-are-foreigners/
Possible route taken by the former aryans:
India is a region that has went through many cultural changes/transformations in the past 2500 years, which is why hardly anyone remembered whenever an invasion happened before the british invaded. How can you expect a vast amount of evidence for 3500 years prior to this day?
Languages:
Ryan (common european/western name) - Aryan (nobles) - Narayan (god of aryavarth) - Aryavarth (land ruled by the Aryans) which is now the modern indian states of "maharasthra, rajputana, punjab, haryana, kashmir, uttar pradesh, himachal pradesh, odissa". Haryana - derived from aryan & hari.
Porus (aryan king) - Persia (land of zoroastrians) - Prussia (german state the name of porus originated from such language) - Russia (original aryans possibly came from southern russia, it would be their earliest known location).
Iran - Ryan - Aryan
This has nothing to do with nationalism or religous attacks, no one cares about those things, people who consider aryan invasion true are those that want to know the truth that are interested in reality unlike the blind patriots and those who don't know the origins of religion.
Aryans (paternal ancestors of most hindus) were not indigenous (native) to india (modern day) at all!
Aryan look alikes:
I have no problem in saying i believe in the aryan invasion theory.
I care about the arguments that people make not the opinions that they have, i dont care if my followers or enemies on this site disagree with my opinion i care about their arguments aka reasons for disagreeing with me. If you think that all these things, arguments, and points have been debunked "already" then prove it instead of simply spamming the same thing or typing sarcastic comments. The main arguments are culture and languages. The language of the south indians are mainly tamil and telugu not hindi which is very similar to latin and sanskrit which was spoken by the Aryans. Arya means noble and Anarya means savage. The fact that "Arya" means noble does not refute anything it just means that the Aryans discriminated against the natives of this land. It is unknown who the natives were (here "native" means whoever was here before aryans) either dravidians, rakshasas or a different group. The third main reason for people to believe aryan invasion or migration is the truth is DNA testing data. This aryan theory was not invented or created by British/Europeans, it has been around before columbus existed. The fact that the greeks made it from Macedon all the way to present day pakistan makes it extremely possible that people from Kazakhstan/Russia/Moscow could have made it to India but unlike Alexander they wouldnt take 6 years instead at most it would take 600 years with lesser advanced equipment.
ReplyDeleteA mystery to me is which culture created the indus civilization, were they aryans or natives or persians that created it? For those that say Indians have different features due to non indian parts like sikkim and assam (parts which may not have had as much contact with most of india) being a part of current india or the invasions of british, huns and muslims causing different features to grow in indians. I have other counterarguments for that. One their were different features for people inside the sub-continent before too, their are descriptions of the looks of other indians being different, some being mongoloid, others being yellow skinned, fair skinned and dark skinned. As for the controversial aspects of this theory the aryan invasion theory is not meant to cause divide, hatred or hurt public sentiments it is for learning about the truth, getting closer to the past, and how these people lived in the country that is now known as the 2nd most populated naiton of this earth. It is my belief that Anarya referred to not just shudras & natives but also mlechchas and rakshasas. In any case their exists many people some who are very smart that firmly believe in this theory, it has yet to be debunked, never has, and is still widely believed in areas of the world.